Recent Articles
When knowing more means doing less: Algorithmic knowledge and digital (dis)engagement among young adults
Myojung Chung
What if knowing how social media algorithms work doesn’t make you a more responsible digital citizen, but a more cynical one? A new survey of U.S. young adults finds that while higher algorithmic awareness and knowledge are linked to greater concerns about misinformation and filter bubbles, individuals with greater algorithmic awareness and knowledge are less likely to correct misinformation or engage with opposing viewpoints on social media—possibly reflecting limited algorithmic agency.

A dual typology of social media interventions and deterrence mechanisms against misinformation
Amir Karami
In response to the escalating threat of misinformation, social media platforms have introduced a wide range of interventions aimed at reducing the spread and influence of false information. However, there is a lack of a coherent macro-level perspective that explains how these interventions operate independently and collectively.
Contextualizing critical disinformation during the 2023 Voice referendum on WeChat: Manipulating knowledge gaps and whitewashing Indigenous rights
Fan Yang, Luke Heemsbergen and Robbie Fordyce
Outside China, WeChat is a conduit for translating and circulating English-language information among the Chinese diaspora. Australian domestic political campaigns exploit the gaps between platform governance and national media policy, using Chinese-language digital media outlets that publish through WeChat’s “Official Accounts” feature, to reproduce disinformation from English-language sources.

Do language models favor their home countries? Asymmetric propagation of positive misinformation and foreign influence audits
Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Tracy Weener, Yung-Chun Chen, Sean Noh, Mingyue Zha and Hsuan Lo
As language models (LMs) continue to develop, concerns over foreign misinformation through models developed in authoritarian countries have emerged. Do LMs favor their home countries? This study audits four frontier LMs by evaluating their favoritism toward world leaders, then measuring how favoritism propagates into misinformation belief.

New sources of inaccuracy? A conceptual framework for studying AI hallucinations
Anqi Shao
In February 2025, Google’s AI Overview fooled itself and its users when it cited an April Fool’s satire about “microscopic bees powering computers” as factual in search results (Kidman, 2025). Google did not intend to mislead, yet the system produced a confident falsehood.
Toxic politics and TikTok engagement in the 2024 U.S. election
Ahana Biswas, Alireza Javadian Sabet and Yu-Ru Lin
What kinds of political content thrive on TikTok during an election year? Our analysis of 51,680 political videos from the 2024 U.S. presidential cycle reveals that toxic and partisan content consistently attracts more user engagement—despite ongoing moderation efforts. Posts about immigration and election fraud, in particular, draw high levels of toxicity and attention.
Explore by Topic
- Artificial Intelligence
- Asia
- Big Data
- China
- Conspiracy Theories
- Content Moderation
- COVID-19
- Debunking
- Disinformation
- Editorial
- Education
- Elections
- Emotion
- Europe
- Fact-checking
- Fake News
- Gaming
- Healthcare
- Impact
- Information Bias
- Law & Government
- Mainstream Media
- Media Literacy
- Partisan Issues
- Philosophy
- Platform Regulation
- Platforms
- Politics
- Propaganda
- Psychology
- Public Health
- Public Opinion
- Research
- Russia
- Search engines
- Social Media
- Sources
- Technology
- Twitter/X
- Vaccines
- Youth
- Youtube